Issue 3627: Inconsistency in the definition of implementation object types. (ada-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: 	4.4.2 "Base types" specifies that PortableServer.Servant_Base
	and CORBA.Value.Impl_Base shall inherit from CORBA.Impl.Object.

	5.2.3 "CORBA.Value.Base" and 5.2.6 "PortableServer.Servant_Base"
	show both types as "abstract tagged null record"s. This contradicts
	the aforementioned provision.

	The following revision is proposed to resolve this issue:
	- In 5.2.3 "CORBA.Value.Base" define type Impl_Base as
           "type Impl_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"
	- In 5.2.6 "PortableServer.Servant_Base", define type Servant_Base as
           "type Servant_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"
Resolution: Accepted as suggested. However, the definition of CORBA.Local.Object should
also be similarly changed
Revised Text: In 5.2.4 (formerly 5.2.3) "CORBA.Value.Base", replace the definition of type
Impl_Base with
"type Impl_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"
In 5.2.6 (formerly 5.2.5) "LocalObject", replace the definition of type Object with
"type Object is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"
In 5.2.7 (formerly 5.2.6) "PortableServer.Servant_Base", replace the definition of
type Servant_Base with
"type Servant_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with
private;"

Actions taken:
May 19, 2000: received issue
January 12, 2010: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Resent-From: quinot@inf.enst.fr
Message-Id: <200005191157.HAA02864@emerald.omg.org>
Received: by melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 11117)
	  id 3D8087671; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:57:24 +0200 (CEST)
To: issues@omg.org
Cc: adabroker-devel@adabroker.eu.org
Subject: Issue on ptc/00-05-04: Inconsistency in the definition of
implementation object types.
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 12:14:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: quinot@inf.enst.fr (Thomas Quinot)
Resent-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 13:57:24 +0200
Resent-To: issues@omg.org
Resent-Message-Id:
<20000519115724.3D8087671@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
Content-Type: text
X-UIDL: Tl0!!So(e9npb!!A"dd9

Specification: Ada Language Mapping Specification 1.2

Formal: ptc/00-05-04

Nature: Revision

Severity: Significant

Summary: Inconsistency in the definition of implementation object
types.

Description:
	4.4.2 "Base types" specifies that PortableServer.Servant_Base
	and CORBA.Value.Impl_Base shall inherit from
	CORBA.Impl.Object.

	5.2.3 "CORBA.Value.Base" and 5.2.6
            "PortableServer.Servant_Base"
	    show both types as "abstract tagged null record"s. This
            contradicts
	    the aforementioned provision.

	    The following revision is proposed to resolve this issue:
	    - In 5.2.3 "CORBA.Value.Base" define type Impl_Base as
           "type Impl_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with
	   private;"
	   - In 5.2.6 "PortableServer.Servant_Base", define type
	   Servant_Base as
           "type Servant_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with
	   private;"

-- 
Thomas Quinot ** Dipartement Informatique & Riseaux **
quinot@inf.enst.fr



To: ada-rtf@omg.org
Cc: Nick Roberts <nickroberts@callnetuk.com>
Subject: Proposed Resolution for Issue 3627
From: Victor Giddings <victor.giddings@mail.ois.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:14:20 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753)


OMG Issue No: 3627

Title: Inconsistency in the definition of implementation object types.

Source:

École Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
Thomas Quinot, Dipartement Informatique & Riseaux, ENST, 46 rue Barrault, 75634 PARIS CEDEX 13 quinot@inf.enst.fr

Summary:

4.4.2 "Base types" specifies that PortableServer.Servant_Base and CORBA.Value.Impl_Base shall inherit from CORBA.Impl.Object.
5.2.3 "CORBA.Value.Base" and 5.2.6 "PortableServer.Servant_Base" show both types as "abstract tagged null record"s. This contradicts the aforementioned provision.
The following revision is proposed to resolve this issue:
In 5.2.3 "CORBA.Value.Base" define type Impl_Base as 
"type Impl_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"
In 5.2.6 "PortableServer.Servant_Base", define type Servant_Base as
"type Servant_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"

Resolution:

Accepted as suggested. However, the definition of CORBA.Local.Object should also be similarly changed.

Revised Text:

In 5.2.3 "CORBA.Value.Base", replace the definition of type Impl_Base with 
"type Impl_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"
In 5.2.5 "LocalObject", replace the definition of type Object with
"type Object is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"
In 5.2.6 "PortableServer.Servant_Base", replace the definition of type Servant_Base with
"type Servant_Base is abstract new CORBA.Impl.Object with private;"

Disposition: Resolved





Victor Giddings  Objective Interface Systems
victor.giddings@mail.ois.com






              ENST   //   46 rue Barrault   //   75634 PARIS CEDEX 13