Issue 3632: Document 99-06-08 - UML Spec (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: I'd find the document easier to digest if Chap 2 had some pictures in it. >> >>I know that the semantics is supposed to be independent of the >>representation. However, Chap 3 *does* contain some semantics in it for >>explanitory purposes (eg: section 3.55.1), so it's not unreasonabnle for >>Chap 2 to contain some notation. If section 2.5.4 (Association) had a >>picture of the diamond shaped association end for aggregations, it would be >>easier to follow what the document is talking about. >> >>At least sections 3.55.1 and 2.11.4 for instance might have links, even if >>only footnotes, to connect actor notation and semantics. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: May 19, 2000: received issue March 9, 2005: closed issue Discussion: longstanding issue regarding separtion of notation and semanti8cs. 2.0 submissions expected to address this. The document for UML 2.0 has been completely rewritten, so this issues is no longer applicable. End of Annotations:===== X-Sender: siegel@192.67.184.65 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 09:19:45 -0400 To: issues@omg.org From: Jon Siegel Subject: Fwd: Document 99-06-08 - UML Spec Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-UIDL: ]p-!!X-Sender: dody@emerald.omg.org >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 >Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 08:52:50 -0400 >To: siegel >From: Dody Keefe >Subject: Fwd: Document 99-06-08 - UML Spec > > >>From: paul.murray@immi.gov.au >>Subject: Document 99-06-08 - UML Spec >>To: info@immi.gov.au >>Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 14:23:12 +1000 >>X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on C3External/C3X(Release 5.0.3 >(Intl)|21 March 2000) at >> 19/05/2000 02:22:46 PM >> >>I'd find the document easier to digest if Chap 2 had some pictures >in it. >> >>I know that the semantics is supposed to be independent of the >>representation. However, Chap 3 *does* contain some semantics in it >for >>explanitory purposes (eg: section 3.55.1), so it's not unreasonabnle >for >>Chap 2 to contain some notation. If section 2.5.4 (Association) had >a >>picture of the diamond shaped association end for aggregations, it >would be >>easier to follow what the document is talking about. >> >>At least sections 3.55.1 and 2.11.4 for instance might have links, >even if >>only footnotes, to connect actor notation and semantics. ================================================================== Jon Siegel email: siegel@omg.org Director, Technology Transfer http://www.omg.org Object Management Group First Needham Place Phone: 781-444-0404 250 First Avenue, Suite 201 Fax: 781-444-0320 Needham, MA 02494 USA ==================================================================