Issue 3689: BASIS_NOT_APPLICABLE                                                                                                                                                                                    (biomolecular-ftf)
Source:  (Mr. Philip Lijnzaad, p.lijnzaad@med.uu.nl)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: For enum Basis, we only have BASIS_NOT_KNOWN; for consistence with enum
   StrandTytpe, shouldn't we also have BASIS_NOT_APPLICABLE? 

(actually, I think this Basis thing may turn out to become on epistemological
nightmare, but I digress)
Resolution: accepted
Revised Text: Add BASIS_NOT_APPLICABLE to the enum. Figure 2-2 needs to be changed. The IDL in 2.1.3 needs to be
changed. A box for BASIS_NOT_APPLICABLE needs to be added. The IDL in C.1 needs to be changed.
Actions taken:
June 9, 2000: received issue
May 24, 2001: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:39:29 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200006091439.e59EdTA17797@o2-3.ebi.ac.uk>
X-Authentication-Warning: o2-3.ebi.ac.uk: lijnzaad set sender to
lijnzaad@ebi.ac.uk using -f
From: Philip Lijnzaad <lijnzaad@ebi.ac.uk>
To: biomolecular-ftf@emerald.omg.org
cc: muilu@ebi.ac.uk
Subject: some issues ... 
Reply-to: lijnzaad@ebi.ac.uk
Content-Type: text
X-UIDL: [C#!!<JUd9^JJ!!KKcd9

Hi all,

my apologies with being so awfully late on this, a few days before OMG
Oslo
(where I will not be going, sorry).


For enum Basis, we only have BASIS_NOT_KNOWN; for consistence with
enum
   StrandTytpe, shouldn't we also have BASIS_NOT_APPLICABLE? 

(actually, I think this Basis thing may turn out to become on
epistemological
nightmare, but I digress)

Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:21:40 -0700
From: Scott Markel <smarkel@netgenics.com>
Organization: NetGenics, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: BSA FTF <biomolecular-ftf@omg.org>
Subject: [OMG-BSA] proposed resolutions for some issues
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-UIDL: W9!e9QLE!!'Okd9>SPe9

In accordance with the consensus at last week's FTF meeting, here are
the proposed resolutions for the issues that were considered
straightforward.  Note that as some multi-issue issues are split
apart,
some of those may also fall into this category.

I'm not reproducing the entire text of the individual issues.  You can
find that at http://cgi.omg.org/issues/biomolecular-ftf.html.  Issues
can
be reported online at http://www.omg.org/technology/issuesform.htm.

This message is *not* a vote.  I just want to make sure these
particular
issues are as straightforward as some of us thought last week.  Please
let me know if you disagree.  Actually it would be nice to know if you
agree, too. :)  If there's been no response by early next week (Philip
is out until then), I'll send out a message kicking off a vote.  If
there
are responses, hopefully we'll get the resolutions resolved and still
vote on these issues next week.

Scott

Issue 3689: BASIS_NOT_APPLICABLE

Resolution: Add BASIS_NOT_APPLICABLE to the enum.  Figure 2-2 needs to
be changed.  The IDL in 2.1.3 needs to be changed.  A box for
BASIS_NOT_APPLICABLE needs to be added.  The IDL in C.1 needs to be
changed.