Issue 3692: DNASequence and RNASequence (biomolecular-ftf) Source: (Mr. Philip Lijnzaad, p.lijnzaad@med.uu.nl) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Can anybody remember why we don't have DNASequence and RNASequence, both inheriting from NucleotideSequence? Resolution: rejected and closed Revised Text: Actions taken: June 9, 2000: received issue May 24, 2001: closed issue Discussion: Rejected. This had been debated by the submitters during the revised submission process. A future RFP could address this. End of Annotations:===== Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:39:29 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200006091439.e59EdTA17797@o2-3.ebi.ac.uk> X-Authentication-Warning: o2-3.ebi.ac.uk: lijnzaad set sender to lijnzaad@ebi.ac.uk using -f From: Philip Lijnzaad To: biomolecular-ftf@emerald.omg.org cc: muilu@ebi.ac.uk Subject: some issues ... Reply-to: lijnzaad@ebi.ac.uk Content-Type: text X-UIDL: [C#!! Organization: NetGenics, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BSA FTF Subject: [OMG-BSA] proposed resolutions for some issues Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-UIDL: W9!e9QLE!!'Okd9>SPe9 In accordance with the consensus at last week's FTF meeting, here are the proposed resolutions for the issues that were considered straightforward. Note that as some multi-issue issues are split apart, some of those may also fall into this category. I'm not reproducing the entire text of the individual issues. You can find that at http://cgi.omg.org/issues/biomolecular-ftf.html. Issues can be reported online at http://www.omg.org/technology/issuesform.htm. This message is *not* a vote. I just want to make sure these particular issues are as straightforward as some of us thought last week. Please let me know if you disagree. Actually it would be nice to know if you agree, too. :) If there's been no response by early next week (Philip is out until then), I'll send out a message kicking off a vote. If there are responses, hopefully we'll get the resolutions resolved and still vote on these issues next week. Scott Issue 3692: DNASequence and RNASequence Resolution: Rejected. A future RFP could address this. ----