Issue 4119: questions to IDL - C++ mapping ( CORBA 2.3, valuebox) (cxx_revision) Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS (Dorota Witaszek, nobody) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: I have the following questions to IDL - C++ mapping CORBA 2.3 (concerning valueboxes). Can somebody give me an answer? 1. I assume that valueboxes T as a special kind of valuetypes also need in C++ the T_var and the T_out types and the T_out types will be used in function signatures for IDL out-parameters. Is it true? 2. The mapping for strings and wstrings requires a definition of C++ operators << and >> to allow a use of strings (wstrings) with the c++ iostreams. What about valueboxes of strings (wstrings) - chapter 1.17.7.4? Is it required to define (in C++) the operators <<, >> to use T_var and T_out with C++ iostreams, where T is a type for a valuebox T of string (wstring)? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 14, 2000: received issue Discussion: deferred in June 2011 to the next RTF End of Annotations:===== Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:50:00 +0100 (MET) From: Dorota Witaszek Message-Id: <200011141050.LAA16286@bashful.fokus.gmd.de> To: cxx_revision@omg.org Subject: questions to IDL - C++ mapping ( CORBA 2.3, valuebox) X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Content-Type: text X-UIDL: `GC!!9P;e9>F~!!V1He9 Hi, I have the following questions to IDL - C++ mapping CORBA 2.3 (concerning valueboxes). Can somebody give me an answer? 1. I assume that valueboxes T as a special kind of valuetypes also need in C++ the T_var and the T_out types and the T_out types will be used in function signatures for IDL out-parameters. Is it true? 2. The mapping for strings and wstrings requires a definition of C++ operators << and >> to allow a use of strings (wstrings) with the c++ iostreams. What about valueboxes of strings (wstrings) - chapter 1.17.7.4? Is it required to define (in C++) the operators <<, >> to use T_var and T_out with C++ iostreams, where T is a type for a valuebox T of string (wstring)? Kind regards, Dorota