Issue 4157: publication of messaging / unchecked_narrow (cxx_revision)
Source: UBS (Mr. Hans Kneubuehl, hans.kneubuehl(at)ubs.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Incorporate Messaging changes relevant to the C++ mapping, as shown in
orbos/98-05-05 pages 115 and 116 together with any changes made to them
by the Messaging RTF, into the IDL-C++ mapping chapter.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
January 19, 2001: received issue
Discussion: 
deferred in June 2011 to the next RTF
End of Annotations:=====
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:16:20 -0500
From: Jishnu Mukerji <jishnu_mukerji@hp.com>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard EIAL, Florham Park NJ USA
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hans.kneubuehl@ubs.com, Juergen Boldt <juergen@omg.org>
Cc: cxx_revision@omg.org, java-rtf@omg.org
Subject: Re: publication of messaging / unchecked_narrow
References: <H00003401608ac3a@MHS>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-UIDL: PC#!!f_Ae9O`<e9l$]d9

hans.kneubuehl@ubs.com wrote:
> 
> CORBA Messaging has been published as part of CORBA 2.4. However,
the adopted
> CORBA Messaging specs also make changes to the C++ and Java language
mappings.
> In particular, orbos/98-05-05 on pages 115 and 116, specifies a new
operation
> unchecked_narrow().
> 
> Is this conformant with OMG policies and procedures?
> Shouldn't specifications that are concerned by a newly available
specifcation,
> be published in synchronization?
> How will the published specifications be aligned?

Hans,

Thanks for bringing this to our attention.

Juergen,

Please create two separate issues, one for C++ RTF and the other for
Java RTF, the first one saying:

Incorporate Messaging changes relevant to the C++ mapping, as shown in
orbos/98-05-05 pages 115 and 116 together with any changes made to
them
by the Messaging RTF, into the IDL-C++ mapping chapter.

and the second one saying:

Incorporate Messaging changes relevant to the Java mapping, as shown
in
orbos/98-05-05 pages 115 and 116 together with any changes made to
them
by the Messaging RTF, into the IDL-Java mapping chapter.

Thanks,

Jishnu.

From: hans.kneubuehl@ubs.com
X-OpenMail-Hops: 2
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:54:37 +0100
Message-Id: <H00003401608ac3a@MHS>
Subject: publication of messaging / unchecked_narrow
MIME-Version: 1.0
TO: cxx_revision@omg.org, java-rtf@omg.org
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="BDY.TXT"
		     ;Creation-Date="Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:54:36 +0100"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-UIDL: :p9e9Q+T!!HJ_d92d'e9

CORBA Messaging has been published as part of CORBA 2.4. However, the
adopted 
CORBA Messaging specs also make changes to the C++ and Java language
mappings. 
In particular, orbos/98-05-05 on pages 115 and 116, specifies a new
operation 
unchecked_narrow().

Is this conformant with OMG policies and procedures?
Shouldn't specifications that are concerned by a newly available
specifcation, 
be published in synchronization?
How will the published specifications be aligned?

Regards
Hans
--
Hans Kneubuehl, UBS AG, P.O. Box, 8098 Zurich, Switzerland
phone: +41 1 238 28 96, fax: +41 1 238 30 11