Issue 4461: The metamodel for DTD should be reviewed (cwm-rtf) Source: International Business Machines (Dr. Daniel T. Chang, dtchang(at)us.ibm.com) Nature: Revision Severity: Significant Summary: This is an issue deferred from the CWM FTF. The metamodel for DTD should be reviewed, and revised if necessary, to make sure that it fully represents DTD information and that it is consistent with the new metamodel for XML Schema. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: August 3, 2001: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== From: webmaster@omg.org Message-Id: <200108031855.f73It6t15169@emerald.omg.org> Date: 03 Aug 2001 14:58:40 -0400 To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Issue/Bug Report Content-Type: Text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-UIDL: jml!!+>!!!-*1!!1h~!! Name: Dan Chang Company: IBM mailFrom: dtchang@us.ibm.com Notification: No Specification: CWM Specification Section: 15 FormalNumber: ad/01-02-01 Version: 1.0 RevisionDate: 2 Feb 2001 Page: 15-369 Nature: Revision Severity: Significant HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) Description This is an issue deferred from the CWM FTF. The metamodel for DTD should be reviewed, and revised if necessary, to make sure that it fully represents DTD information and that it is consistent with the new metamodel for XML Schema. From: webmaster@omg.org Message-Id: <200108031902.f73J2jt15349@emerald.omg.org> Date: 03 Aug 2001 15:06:19 -0400 To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Issue/Bug Report Content-Type: Text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-UIDL: A+1!!&Nh!!l"&e9B5M!! Name: Dan Chang Company: IBM mailFrom: dtchang@us.ibm.com Notification: No Specification: CWM Specification Section: 12 FormalNumber: ad/01-02-01 Version: 1.0 RevisionDate: 2 Feb 2001 Page: 12-269 Nature: Revision Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) Description This is an issue deferred from the CWM FTF. The metamodel for DTD should be review, and revised if necessary, to ensure that it fully represents DTD information and that it is consistent with the new metamodel for XML Schema. (This issue has already been submitted. Please correct the chapter and page numbers per this submission.)