Issue 4684: Section 12.1 SPEM to UML Correspondence Table                                                                                                                                                           (spem-ftf)
Source: France Telecom R&D (Mr. Mariano Belaunde, mariano.belaunde@orange-ftgroup.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: For clarity alternative representations should appear in the table. For
instance UseCases
  to represent work definitions.
Resolution: see above
Revised Text: Delete the paragraph page 11-3 "The following table shows which UML base element is used …"
Delete the table below that paragraph.
Move the Notes section that was beneath the table and put it immediately under Figure 11-2. 
In the table in section 11-5 add the UML package to each of the base class names e.g. Core::Class instead of Class.

Actions taken:
November 7, 2001: received issue
October 23, 2002: closed issue
Discussion: 
Resolution:
Instead of modifying this table, noticing that the later table on page 11-9 duplicates almost all of its information, delete this table

End of Annotations:=====
From: BELAUNDE Mariano FTRD/DTL/LAN
       <mariano.belaunde@rd.francetelecom.com>
To: spem-ftf@omg.org
Subject: Issues to the SPEM document
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 12:43:16 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	      charset="iso-8859-1"
X-UIDL: Nnl!!iMLe9;"'!!~>;!!

Hi all,

You will find below a list of issues regarding the current version of
the SPEM specification.

Regards,
Mariano Belaunde
France Telecom R&D
------------------------------------------------------


Section 12.1 SPEM to UML Correspondence Table
  For clarity alternative representations should appear in the
  table. For
instance UseCases
  to represent work definitions.