Issue 4689: Typos in the current SPEM document                                                                                                                                                                      (spem-ftf)
Source: France Telecom R&D (Mr. Mariano Belaunde, mariano.belaunde@orange-ftgroup.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: TYPO issues
- Section 1.5/UML page 8
     "Software Process Engineering Model" should be replaced by
     "Software Process Engineering Metamodel"
- Section 1.5/Workflow, page 10
     "None of the these areas overlaps the SPE submission" should be
replaced by
     "None of these areas overlaps the SPEM submission"
- Section 3.1, page 17
  "The SPEM_Foundation:;Data_Types" should be replaced by
  "The SPEM_Foundation::Data_Types"
- Section 3.4, page 22
      Well-formedness rules need to be re-numbered.
- End of page 27
      A dot is expected at the end of the sentence.
- Section 7.1/Categorizes
     "Discpline" ==> "Discipline"
- Section 8.2, page 33
     "ProcessRoke" ==>ProcessRole

Resolution: Accept
Revised Text: Section 1.5 replace "Software Process Engineering Model" by "Software Process Engineering Metamodel"
Section 1.5.3 replace "None of the these areas overlaps the SPE specification" by "None of these areas overlaps the SPEM specification"
Globally number all well-formedness rules [C1], [C2] etc. in the sections 2.3.1, 6.2, 7.5, 8.5, 9.5.  Annotate those in section 2.3.1 to cross-reference them to the UML 1.4 specification.

Actions taken:
November 7, 2001: received issue
October 23, 2002: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
From: BELAUNDE Mariano FTRD/DTL/LAN
       <mariano.belaunde@rd.francetelecom.com>
To: spem-ftf@omg.org
Subject: Issues to the SPEM document
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 12:43:16 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	      charset="iso-8859-1"
X-UIDL: Nnl!!iMLe9;"'!!~>;!!

Hi all,

You will find below a list of issues regarding the current version of
the SPEM specification.

Regards,
Mariano Belaunde
France Telecom R&D
------------------------------------------------------

TYPO issues
- Section 1.5/UML page 8
     "Software Process Engineering Model" should be replaced by
     "Software Process Engineering Metamodel"
- Section 1.5/Workflow, page 10
     "None of the these areas overlaps the SPE submission" should be
replaced by
     "None of these areas overlaps the SPEM submission"
- Section 3.1, page 17
  "The SPEM_Foundation:;Data_Types" should be replaced by
  "The SPEM_Foundation::Data_Types"
- Section 3.4, page 22
      Well-formedness rules need to be re-numbered.
- End of page 27
      A dot is expected at the end of the sentence.
- Section 7.1/Categorizes
     "Discpline" ==> "Discipline"
- Section 8.2, page 33
     "ProcessRoke" ==>ProcessRole