Issue 5048: Section 6.2.2 UML Extensions, page 103 (uml-scheduling-ftf)
Source: U.S. Army Cecom-CSE (Mr. Tom Wheeler, )
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: The proposed <<CRConcurrent>> stereotype appears to overlap concepts found in UML active classes and objects yet there is no discussion of their relationships.  Recommend such a discussion be included.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 

Actions taken:
March 20, 2002: received issue
Discussion: 
I will add such discussion in order to state "active" stereotype regarding these one introduced in the SPT profile. I fully share this point. But the problem is very difficult to solve because in theory a UML profile should be an extension or a subset of the UML. In this case, the UML instantiate a concept that is defined in a generic way in a profile. So how to status about this issue?
BTW, we will have the same problem later with the version 2.0 of the UML profile SPT regarding concept of time for example


End of Annotations:=====
This is issue # 5048

Section 6.2.2 UML Extensions, page 103

The proposed <<CRConcurrent>> stereotype appears to overlap concepts
found in UML active classes and objects yet there is no discussion of
their relationships.  Recommend such a discussion be included.