Issue 5085: The different profiles do not pay special attention to identify well-formed (uml-scheduling-ftf)
Source: Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (Prof. Miguel de Miguel, mmiguel(at)dit.upm.es)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: The different profiles do not pay special attention to identify well-formed rules. Each stereotype has a set of rules, but they are not OCL constraints. The rules pay attention to the consistence of the stereotypes and their tagged values, but there are not consistence rules of complete models (e.g. the workload elements in performance models must have associated some steps that must be identified in the context of the model, and this identification depends on the mapping).

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 20, 2002: received issue
Discussion: 
Valid point; but probably exceeds the scope of an FTF (Bran). I guess this is a complaint that some of the semantic relationships that exist in the domain model are not captured explicitly through OCL constraints. This is definitely the case, but would require significant effort to rectify - beyond the scope of an RTF but should be a requirement in the future RfP.

End of Annotations:=====
This is issue # 5084

link between the already existing UML elements that target time
aspects

"Position regarding to existing UML concepts pertaining to time
aspects
In the proposal, I have not really seen something about a link between
the already existing UML elements that target time aspects
(e.g. TimeEvent, active/passive objects, concurrent states) and the
concepts proposed by the SPT profile. I think the proposal does not
position enough itself regarding to UML elements.