Issue 5316:  there could be a better, more complete RTtimeValue (p90+) (uml-scheduling-ftf)
Source: The MathWorks (Mr. Alan Moore, alan.moore(at)mathworks.co.uk)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: "1) I believe that there could be a better, more complete RTtimeValue (p90+).
While the included format does handle many situations it is not sufficiently
general. For example, it could handle several other common time designators,
e.g., time zones (EST, GMT, PDT,...), Julian Date, and (the un-related)
Julian Calendar, approximates times, and to support diversity, non Gregorian
calendars."

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
May 22, 2002: received issue
Discussion: 
Again, the existing comment reflects a misunderstanding of an RTF mandate. This is a new feature that requires a new RFP.
End of Annotations:=====
This is issue # 5316

 there could be a better, more complete RTtimeValue (p90+)

"1) I believe that there could be a better, more complete RTtimeValue
(p90+).
While the included format does handle many situations it is not
sufficiently
general. For example, it could handle several other common time
designators,
e.g., time zones (EST, GMT, PDT,...), Julian Date, and (the
un-related)
Julian Calendar, approximates times, and to support diversity, non
Gregorian
calendars."