Issue 5434: Licensing Service issue (issues) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: The Action struct has a member of type ActionRequired, name 'action' . The JacORB (1.4 beat 4) IDL comiler/parser complains that the declarator has already been used (identifier collision): Error in CosLicensingManager.idl, line:28(17): Declarator action already defined in scope. ActionRequired 1 error(s). Errors compiling CosLicensingManager. The Corba spec (2.4 00-10-01) states in the Lexical definitions that upper and lower case are regarded as the same. Is the use of the Action & action definitions twice then a collision? Can the the action variable be renamed in the IDL file to something like action_required without affecting any other specification / Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: June 18, 2002: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 18 Jun 2002 04:17:16 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Mark Biggerstaff Company: OES Technologies Ltd mailFrom: mrb@oestec.com Notification: Yes Specification: Licensing Service Section: 2.2 FormalNumber: 00-06-17 Version: 1.0 RevisionDate: April 2000 Page: 2-5 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0) Description The Action struct has a member of type ActionRequired, name 'action' . The JacORB (1.4 beat 4) IDL comiler/parser complains that the declarator has already been used (identifier collision): Error in CosLicensingManager.idl, line:28(17): Declarator action already defined in scope. ActionRequired 1 error(s). Errors compiling CosLicensingManager. The Corba spec (2.4 00-10-01) states in the Lexical definitions that upper and lower case are regarded as the same. Is the use of the Action & action definitions twice then a collision? Can the the action variable be renamed in the IDL file to something like action_required without affecting any other specification / interoperability? regards, M R Biggerstaff