Issue 5490: Change in the DesignElement package (gene-expression-ftf) Source: Rosetta Biosoftware Business Unit (Mr. Michael D Miller, nobody) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Recommend to change, in the DesignElement package, the cardinality of the Position end of the DistanceUnit association between Position and DistanceUnit from 0..n to 1..1 since 0..n and COMPOSITE are inconsistent with each other for an end role. (that is, since the DistanceUnit is a composite aggregation it must belong to one and only one Position) Only effects the Model and the generated MAGE.xmi file: <Foundation.Data_Types.MultiplicityRange.lower>0</Foundation.Data_Types.Mult iplicityRange.lower> <Foundation.Data_Types.MultiplicityRange.upper>-1</Foundation.Data_Types.Mul tiplicityRange.upper> to <Foundation.Data_Types.MultiplicityRange.lower>1</Foundation.Data_Types.Mult iplicityRange.lower> <Foundation.Data_Types.MultiplicityRange.upper>1</Foundation.Data_Types.Mult iplicityRange.upper> Resolution: see below Revised Text: Changes to specification: Figure 2-7 is updated Changes effects the Model and the generated MAGE.xmi file by modifying the DistanceUnit association.. Actions taken: July 14, 2002: received issue December 11, 2002: closed issue Discussion: Recommend to change, in the DesignElement package, the cardinality of the Position end of the DistanceUnit association between Position and DistanceUnit from 0..n to 1..1 since 0..n and COMPOSITE are inconsistent with each other for an end role. (that is, since the DistanceUnit is a composite aggregation it must belong to one and only one Position) End of Annotations:===== X-Server-Uuid: F7D3E4A3-3C15-41D2-AC5D-A7D3F094E28F From: "Miller, Michael (Rosetta)" To: "'Juergen Boldt'" cc: "'GE FTF'" Subject: Issues for GE Specification Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:46:45 -0700 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-WSS-ID: 112F21B171906-01-01 Hi Juergen, Here's the first batch of issues for the Gene Expression FTF (dtc/02-02-05). Also, since the DTD and the XMI files are normative, shouldn't they be available from the FTF site, along with the specification? The DTD in particular is important. We've assigned private issue numbers (which aren't particularly consecutive) to some of the issues which I'm noting--I'm expecting them to get an entirely different issue number from you that the FTF will refer to! For others who might want to raise issues, should they send directly to you or is there an appropriate e-mail address? thanks, Michael Michael Miller Senior Application Developer Rosetta Biosoftware michael_miller@rosettabio.com www.rosettabio.com Recommend to change, in the DesignElement package, the cardinality of the Position end of the DistanceUnit association between Position and DistanceUnit from 0..n to 1..1 since 0..n and COMPOSITE are inconsistent with each other for an end role. (that is, since the DistanceUnit is a composite aggregation it must belong to one and only one Position) Only effects the Model and the generated MAGE.xmi file: 0 -1 to 1 1