Issue 5510: 69.8.2.3 The choices Element, page 69-537 (components-ftf)
Source: Raytheon (Mr. Gerald Lee Bickle, Gerald.L.Bickle(at)raytheon.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Choices Element - It appears multiple ranges do not make sense for a simple
definition.  If so, then remove the range element from the choices element
definition
and make range an optional element for a simple.


Current definition
<!ELEMENT choices ( choice | range )+


Change to


     <!ELEMENT choices ( choice )+


<!ELEMENT simple
( description?
, value
, choices?
, range?
, defaultvalue?
) >

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 15, 2002: received issue
Discussion: 
Resolution:
None as this is deferred to the final report of the Components 1.1 RTF.
Revised Text:
None as this is deferred to the final report of the Components 1.1 RTF

End of Annotations:=====
From: Gerald_L_Bickle@raytheon.com 
Subject: CCM Properties DTD Extensions & Changes 
To: issues@omg.org, components-rtf@omg.org 
Cc: "Mike McClimens" <mikemc@mitre.org>, "Smith, Jeff"
<jesmith@mc.com>, 
   Edwin.Wrench@ITT.COM, mike.mcclimens@saalt.army.mil, 
   "Mike McClimens" <mikemc@mitre.org>, 
   David Fitkin <dwfitkin@rockwellcollins.com>,
   jeffrey.olynick@baesystems.com 
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8  June 18, 2001 
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:57:19 -0500 
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NotesServer3/HDC(Release 5.0.8
|June 18, 2001) at 07/15/2002 
 01:57:19 PM 


Document ptc/2001-11-03, CORBA Component Model


4.   69.8.2.3 The choices Element, page 69-537
Choices Element - It appears multiple ranges do not make sense for a
simple
definition.  If so, then remove the range element from the choices
element
definition
and make range an optional element for a simple.


Current definition
<!ELEMENT choices ( choice | range )+


Change to


     <!ELEMENT choices ( choice )+


<!ELEMENT simple
( description?
, value
, choices?
, range?
, defaultvalue?
) >