Issue 5517: 69.3.2.15 The implementation Element, pages 69-478/479 (components-ftf)
Source: Raytheon (Mr. Gerald Lee Bickle, Gerald.L.Bickle(at)raytheon.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Add license element to implementation element. Why is the license element
restricted
to the softpkg level only? This is saying all implementations have the same
license.
Cannot each implementation have its own different license? Suggest adding
license
element to implementation element.


Current Format


<!ELEMENT implementation
( description
| code
| compiler
| dependency
| descriptor
| extension
| programminglanguage
| humanlanguage
| os
| propertyfile
| processor
| runtime
)* >
<!ATTLIST implementation
id ID #IMPLIED
variation CDATA #IMPLIED >


New Format


<!ELEMENT implementation
( description
| code
| compiler
| dependency
| descriptor
| extension
| license
| programminglanguage
| humanlanguage
| os
| propertyfile
| processor
| runtime
)* >
<!ATTLIST implementation
id ID #IMPLIED
variation CDATA #IMPLIED >
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 17, 2002: received issue
Discussion: 
Resolution:
None as this is deferred to the final report of the Components 1.1 RTF.
Revised Text:
None as this is deferred to the final report of the Components 1.1 RTF

End of Annotations:=====
From: Gerald_L_Bickle@RAYTHEON.COM 
Subject: CCM Softpkg DTD Extensions & Changes 
To: issues@omg.org, components-rtf@omg.org 
Cc: "Mike McClimens" <mikemc@mitre.org>, "Smith, Jeff"
<jesmith@mc.com>, 
   Edwin.Wrench@ITT.COM, mike.mcclimens@saalt.army.mil, 
   "Mike McClimens" <mikemc@mitre.org>, 
   David Fitkin <dwfitkin@rockwellcollins.com>,
   jeffrey.olynick@baesystems.com 
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8  June 18, 2001 
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:57:08 -0500 
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NotesServer3/HDC(Release 5.0.8
|June 18, 2001) at 07/17/2002 
 12:57:09 PM 
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by emerald.omg.org
id g6HHsWC06347 


Document ptc/2001-11-03, CORBA Component Model


4.   69.3.2.15 The implementation Element, pages 69-478/479
Add license element to implementation element. Why is the license
element
restricted
to the softpkg level only? This is saying all implementations have the
same
license.
Cannot each implementation have its own different license? Suggest
adding
license
element to implementation element.


Current Format


<!ELEMENT implementation
( description
| code
| compiler
| dependency
| descriptor
| extension
| programminglanguage
| humanlanguage
| os
| propertyfile
| processor
| runtime
)* >
<!ATTLIST implementation
id ID #IMPLIED
variation CDATA #IMPLIED >


New Format


<!ELEMENT implementation
( description
| code
| compiler
| dependency
| descriptor
| extension
| license
| programminglanguage
| humanlanguage
| os
| propertyfile
| processor
| runtime
)* >
<!ATTLIST implementation
id ID #IMPLIED
variation CDATA #IMPLIED