Issue 5518: 69.3.2.25 The propertyfile Element, page 69-482 (components-ftf)
Source: Raytheon (Mr. Gerald Lee Bickle, Gerald.L.Bickle(at)raytheon.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Propertyfile clarification is needed for consistent behavior.
The only statement made about propertyfile is that the implementation's
propertyfile
has precedence over the same propertyfile types at the softpkg level. Why
are
multiple property files needed at the softpkg and implementation levels? If
more than
one propertfile exist at any level, which property file has precedence in
the list? If
multiple property files exists are they merged together? Are the softpkg's
descriptor
element property files merge with the softpkg property files and which one
has
precedence? Are the implementation's descriptor property files merge with
the
implementation property files, and which one has precedence? Are
implementation
property files merge with the softpkg property files?

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 17, 2002: received issue
Discussion: 
Resolution:
None as this is deferred to the final report of the Components 1.1 RTF.
Revised Text:
None as this is deferred to the final report of the Components 1.1 RTF

End of Annotations:=====
From: Gerald_L_Bickle@RAYTHEON.COM 
Subject: CCM Softpkg DTD Extensions & Changes 
To: issues@omg.org, components-rtf@omg.org 
Cc: "Mike McClimens" <mikemc@mitre.org>, "Smith, Jeff"
<jesmith@mc.com>, 
   Edwin.Wrench@ITT.COM, mike.mcclimens@saalt.army.mil, 
   "Mike McClimens" <mikemc@mitre.org>, 
   David Fitkin <dwfitkin@rockwellcollins.com>,
   jeffrey.olynick@baesystems.com 
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8  June 18, 2001 
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:57:08 -0500 
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NotesServer3/HDC(Release 5.0.8
|June 18, 2001) at 07/17/2002 
 12:57:09 PM 
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by emerald.omg.org
id g6HHsWC06347 


Document ptc/2001-11-03, CORBA Component Model


5.   69.3.2.25 The propertyfile Element, page 69-482
Propertyfile clarification is needed for consistent behavior.
The only statement made about propertyfile is that the
implementation's
propertyfile
has precedence over the same propertyfile types at the softpkg
level. Why
are
multiple property files needed at the softpkg and implementation
levels? If
more than
one propertfile exist at any level, which property file has precedence
in
the list? If
multiple property files exists are they merged together? Are the
softpkg's
descriptor
element property files merge with the softpkg property files and which
one
has
precedence? Are the implementation's descriptor property files merge
with
the
implementation property files, and which one has precedence? Are
implementation
property files merge with the softpkg property files