Issue 553:  PolicyType declared as enum (section B.9.2) (sec-rev)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: PolicyType is declared as enum thus making it not easy to extend. Define it as "unsigned long", and then define the various PolicyTypes as const values

Resolution:  resolved, close issue
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 24, 1997: received issue
March 26, 1998: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Return-Path: <daemon>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 18:29:35 -0400
From: Jishnu Mukerji <jis@fpk.hp.com>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard New Jersey Labs
Subject: A few things to think about
Errors-To: owner-sec-rev
Sender: owner-sec-rev
X-OMG: sec-rev
To: sec-rev


(2) In Section B.9.2 PolicyType is declared as an enum thus making it
not very easy to extend. The proposal is to define it as a "unsigned
long", and then define the various PolicyType's as const values. 

Any objections to that?