Issue 5651: which actual interface type should be used in parallel object's reference? (dataparallel-ftf) Source: Mercury Computer Systems (Mr. James E. Kulp, nobody) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Parallel implementation type - which actual interface type should be used in the parallel object's reference? This is specified as the type_id parameter to the create_object operation of the GenericFactory interface as inherited by the ParallelObectManager. Note this type also implies the implementation type of the part objects (the part version of the interface). [Reviewers: we could add a property to be used in the criteria property list per part that would supply a part interface that must be derived from the parallel implementation type?] ---- Is the 'normal' use case for type_id to be equal to DP_<iface>Part interface type? How do you envision type_id being used to create the individual part objects? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 26, 2002: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== X-Dreamscape-Track-Mars-A: 208-59-176-137.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com [208.59.176.137] X-Dreamscape-Track-Mars-B: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:08:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:09:12 -0400 From: Jim Kulp X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en To: Juergen Boldt Subject: DP CORBA issues Several (8) issues have been communicated to me directly from non-OMG people for DP CORBA, and I wanted to get them into the system: Issue 5: ---------- Parallel implementation type - which actual interface type should be used in the parallel object's reference? This is specified as the type_id parameter to the create_object operation of the GenericFactory interface as inherited by the ParallelObectManager. Note this type also implies the implementation type of the part objects (the part version of the interface). [Reviewers: we could add a property to be used in the criteria property list per part that would supply a part interface that must be derived from the parallel implementation type?] ---- Is the 'normal' use case for type_id to be equal to DP_Part interface type? How do you envision type_id being used to create the individual part objects?