Issue 5658: parameters of object flow states (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: Texas Department of Human Services (Mr. Srinivas Nedunuri, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: parameters of object flow states -- The Notation section of the UML 1.4 Spec does not discuss it, nor is an example provided. I am still in the dark about how parameters are supposed to be used in the context of object flow states. Are output parameters supposed to be like reference parameters in the Algol style languages? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 27, 2002: received issue March 9, 2005: closed issue Discussion: UML 1.x object flow states have been replaced in UML 2 by pins, which specify how parameters get their runtime values. The UML 1.x object flow state notation is supported by pins. Disposition: Closed, no change End of Annotations:===== From: "Nedunuri,Srinivas" To: "'issues@omg.org'" Cc: "'wask@omg.org'" Subject: parameters to object flow states Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:26:30 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Hello, I have been studying the UML 1.4 spec for some time now, and have been struggling with how to interpret some of the statements, particularly regarding Activity Graphs/Diagrams. I would appreciate clarification on the following: 4) parameters of object flow states -- The Notation section of the UML 1.4 Spec does not discuss it, nor is an example provided. I am still in the dark about how parameters are supposed to be used in the context of object flow states. Are output parameters supposed to be like reference parameters in the Algol style languages?