Issue 573:  Type Extensions and code set negotiation (interop)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: page 26 of ptc/97-01-01: replace "Code set negotiation is not....." with"Code set negotiation is performed on a per-request basis."

Resolution:  closed with no revision required
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
May 14, 1997: received issue
March 26, 1998: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====


Return-Path: <ter@holta.ho.lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:49:32 -0500
From: ter@holta.ho.lucent.com (T E Rutt)
To: interop@omg.org
Subject: Interop 1.2 RTF Conference call (Proposed revisions and
issues)

To: Interop 1.2	RTF
Subject: Dec 19, Conference Call
From: Tom Rutt,	RTF Chair

I have attached	my proposed Resolutions	of Issues for ORB
Interoperability 1.2 Revision Task Force.  There was no
meeting	of the RTF at the NJ meeting, since everyone is	so
busy I decided to take a whack at coming up with resolutions
for the	issues.

We need	further	discussion on some of these issues, as
indicated in the actions section of each issue.

A conference Call is scheduled for Friday, December 19,	at
11:00 EST.  I have the bridge reserved for 2 hours.

The bridge phone number	(16 ports reserved) is:
+1 630 224 444	Conference Code	674 369
Let me know if you will	participate, so	I can ensure 16	is
enough ports.

Tom Rutt


Issue 573: Type	Extensions and code set
negotiation (interop)

Source:	Xerox (Mr. William C. Janssen, Jr.,
janssen@parc.xerox.com)
Nature:	Uncategorized
Severity:
Summary: page 26 of ptc/97-01-01: replace "Code	set
negotiation is not....."
with"Code set negotiation is performed on a per-request
basis."

Resolution: This needs discussion.  It seems reasonable,
since the message flows	on the request message service
context	parameter.  Sending the	service	context	on later
messages could be seen as a "renegotiation".  This would
make renegotation necessary only if it is required (i.e.,
blank service context means keep negotiatied code set rather
than reverting to Latin-1 for that message).
Revised	Text:
Actions	taken:	Needs discussion in conference call.
May 14,	1997: received issue