Issue 5808: Issue : Section 6.5 (hutn-ftf) Source: France Telecom R&D (Mr. Mariano Belaunde, mariano.belaunde@orange-ftgroup.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Issue : Section 6.5 : Missing where to put the full representation of a non inlined contained instance. According to the specification, a contained instance maybe represented by a full representation of the instance or by a reference to the instance. However, in the latter case, the specification does noy say nothing about where to place the full representation of the contained instances that are not inlined. Suggestion for resolution: In the second paragraph, after "or by a reference to the instance.", add the following sentence: "In the latter case the full representation of the contained instance must appear as a top level definition in the content of the current package. In addition, in order to distinguish between these "forwarded" definitions and the other "top-level" definitions we should consider introducing a prefix keyword (such as "forward", to be added in the ClassHeader). Resolution: see below Revised Text: In the second paragraph of Section 6.5, after "or by a reference to the instance.", add the following sentence: "In the latter case the full representation of the contained instance must appear as a top level definition in the content of the current package." Actions taken: January 13, 2003: received issue September 24, 2004: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Subject: Issues for the HUTN FTF Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:54:49 +0100 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Issues for the HUTN FTF Thread-Index: AcK7HBpU397iUQ+WTOq/6odFTDzC5g== From: "BELAUNDE Mariano FTRD/DTL/LAN" To: "Juergen Boldt" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2003 15:54:50.0281 (UTC) FILETIME=[1ACB6190:01C2BB1C] Juergen, You will find below 9 issues for the HUTN FTF. Thanks in advance, Mariano -------------------------------- Issue : Section 6.5 : Missing where to put the full representation of a non inlined contained instance. According to the specification, a contained instance maybe represented by a full representation of the instance or by a reference to the instance. However, in the latter case, the specification does noy say nothing about where to place the full representation of the contained instances that are not inlined. Suggestion for resolution: In the second paragraph, after "or by a reference to the instance.", add the following sentence: "In the latter case the full representation of the contained instance must appear as a top level definition in the content of the current package. In addition, in order to distinguish between these "forwarded" definitions and the other "top-level" definitions we should consider introducing a prefix keyword (such as "forward", to be added in the ClassHeader).