Issue 5810: Section 6.5: Need to improve readability when referencing instances (hutn-ftf) Source: France Telecom R&D (Mr. Mariano Belaunde, mariano.belaunde@orange-ftgroup.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Issue Section 6.5: Need to improve readability when referencing instances. Inside the class contents, due to the multiple short-hands, it's not always clear whether an instance is being defined (fully represented) or is being referenced . To avoid any possible confusion and improve readability, a "ref" prefix keyword could be added. Suggestion for resolution: Add the "ref" keyword in ClassInstanceRef [23] ClassInstanceRef := ('ref' (<ClasName>? 14:ClassRefString) ) | ExternalObjRef Need discussion : should the "ref" keyword be optional or mandatory? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: January 13, 2003: received issue September 24, 2004: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Subject: Issues for the HUTN FTF Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:54:49 +0100 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Issues for the HUTN FTF Thread-Index: AcK7HBpU397iUQ+WTOq/6odFTDzC5g== From: "BELAUNDE Mariano FTRD/DTL/LAN" To: "Juergen Boldt" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2003 15:54:50.0281 (UTC) FILETIME=[1ACB6190:01C2BB1C] Juergen, You will find below 9 issues for the HUTN FTF. Thanks in advance, Mariano -------------------------------- Issue Section 6.5: Need to improve readability when referencing instances. Inside the class contents, due to the multiple short-hands, it's not always clear whether an instance is being defined (fully represented) or is being referenced . To avoid any possible confusion and improve readability, a "ref" prefix keyword could be added. Suggestion for resolution: Add the "ref" keyword in ClassInstanceRef [23] ClassInstanceRef := ('ref' (? 14:ClassRefString) ) | ExternalObjRef Need discussion : should the "ref" keyword be optional or mandatory?