Issue 5860: latest adopted MOF revision is 1.4. However the profile is based on MOF 1.3 (uml-edoc-ftf)
Source: Oracle (Mr. Martin Matula, nobody)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: The latest adopted MOF revision is 1.4. However the profile is based
on MOF 1.3 and thus it does not define a straighforward mapping for
CollectionTypes, EnumerationTypes, PrimitiveTypes, etc
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 13, 2003: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:30:21 +0100 
From: Martin Matula <Martin.Matula@Sun.COM> 
Subject: Issues (UML Profile for MOF) 
To: uml-edoc-ftf@omg.org 
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) 
 Gecko/20021130 


Hi,
I am sorry to send this a month after the comment deadline, but as I
understand from the Keith's e-mail below, it is OK to raise further
issues before April 15th.
Here are some issues related to UML Profile for MOF - I am raising
them
as I think that as is the profile is quite useless (I was trying to
implement it and then decided to go with my own modification - see
http://mdr.netbeans.org/uml2mof/profile.html). Since all of the issues
below are resolved in my modification of the profile, I am ready to
provide the resolutions quite quickly. Anyway, if you think that these
come too late I don't mind - I just thought I should let you know what
my experience from trying to apply this profile was.
Here are the issues:
- The latest adopted MOF revision is 1.4. However the profile is based
on MOF 1.3 and thus it does not define a straighforward mapping for
CollectionTypes, EnumerationTypes, PrimitiveTypes, etc.