Issue 5861: The profile does not state, which revision of UML it is applicable to (uml-edoc-ftf)
Source: Oracle (Mr. Martin Matula, nobody)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: The profile does not state, which revision of UML it is applicable to.
It seems that it can be used with UML 1.3 (since in AssociationEnd
mapping, "type" reference is used - this reference was renamed in UML
1.4 to "participant"). I think it would be better to support newer
revisions of UML (1.4 and 1.5).

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 13, 2003: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:30:21 +0100 
From: Martin Matula <Martin.Matula@Sun.COM> 
Subject: Issues (UML Profile for MOF) 
To: uml-edoc-ftf@omg.org 
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) 
 Gecko/20021130 


Hi,
I am sorry to send this a month after the comment deadline, but as I
understand from the Keith's e-mail below, it is OK to raise further
issues before April 15th.
Here are some issues related to UML Profile for MOF - I am raising
them
as I think that as is the profile is quite useless (I was trying to
implement it and then decided to go with my own modification - see
http://mdr.netbeans.org/uml2mof/profile.html). Since all of the issues
below are resolved in my modification of the profile, I am ready to
provide the resolutions quite quickly. Anyway, if you think that these
come too late I don't mind - I just thought I should let you know what
my experience from trying to apply this profile was.
Here are the issues

The profile does not state, which revision of UML it is applicable to.
It seems that it can be used with UML 1.3 (since in AssociationEnd
mapping, "type" reference is used - this reference was renamed in UML
1.4 to "participant"). I think it would be better to support newer
revisions of UML (1.4 and 1.5).