Issue 5893: definition of FixedHolder should have been removed (java-rtf)
Source: Objective Interface Systems (Mr. Victor Giddings, victor.giddings(at)mail.ois.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: The resolution of issue #3668 should have removed the definition of FixedHolder. There is no need for a Holder for an anonymous Fixed type since none can be defined. Type specific Holders are necessary in order to define the correct read and write operations that use the write_fixed and read_fixed defined by the resolution of 3668.


Proposed resolution:
Remove the definition of FixedHolder from section 1.4.1.4 (page 1-11).

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 1, 2003: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
X-Sender: giddiv@postel 
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 21:17:14 -0500 
To: issues@omg.org 
From: Victor Giddings <victor.giddings@ois.com> 
Subject: FixedHolder obsolete 


This issue is directed to the IDL to Java RTF:


Issue: The resolution of issue #3668 should have removed the definition of FixedHolder. There is no need for a Holder for an anonymous Fixed type since none can be defined. Type specific Holders are necessary in order to define the correct read and write operations that use the write_fixed and read_fixed defined by the resolution of 3668.


Proposed resolution:
Remove the definition of FixedHolder from section 1.4.1.4 (page 1-11).



Victor Giddings         mailto:victor.giddings@ois.com
Senior Product Engineer +1 703 295 6500
Objective Interface Systems     Fax: +1 703 295 6501