Issue 5914: Section 4 of the Specification -- the IDL (lwlog-ftf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 
            "Complete Logging Service IDL"

* Names the raised exception "InvalidParam" without ever
   declaring it.  Add to the IDL, probably near the beginning,
   the following declaration, or its equivalent:
       exception InvalidParam {
          string Details;
       };


* Syntax error in:
        enum LogFullAction (WRAP, HALT);
   Change to:
        enum LogFullAction {WRAP, HALT};

  [Error above is also in the specification text, section 3.2.4]

* These types appear needed by the IDL but nowhere actually
   defined in the IDL:
                        ProducerLogRecordSequence
                        LogProducerRecord

They are naming-confusion/consistency problems, and they
also appear in the text of the specification.
   They involve writers' confusion between the interface
name ("LogProducer") and the type names ProducerLog...
It is correctable by changing the current defective declaration
from:
        typedef sequence<LogProducerRecord
           LogProducerRecordSequence;
to:
        typedef sequence<ProducerLogRecord
           ProducerLogRecordSequence;
The text of the specification in section 3.3.3 (page 3-15) should
also be corrected for these word inversion problems.

end 1st issue. These are IDL issues in addition to the ones identified in 5885.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 23, 2003: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
1st Issue


(Section 4 of the Specification -- the IDL)

            "Complete Logging Service IDL"

* Names the raised exception "InvalidParam" without ever
   declaring it.  Add to the IDL, probably near the beginning,
   the following declaration, or its equivalent:
       exception InvalidParam {
          string Details;
       };


* Syntax error in:
        enum LogFullAction (WRAP, HALT);
   Change to:
        enum LogFullAction {WRAP, HALT};

  [Error above is also in the specification text, section 3.2.4]

* These types appear needed by the IDL but nowhere actually
   defined in the IDL:
                        ProducerLogRecordSequence
                        LogProducerRecord

They are naming-confusion/consistency problems, and they
also appear in the text of the specification.
   They involve writers' confusion between the interface
name ("LogProducer") and the type names ProducerLog...
It is correctable by changing the current defective declaration
from:
        typedef sequence<LogProducerRecord
           LogProducerRecordSequence;
to:
        typedef sequence<ProducerLogRecord
           ProducerLogRecordSequence;
The text of the specification in section 3.3.3 (page 3-15) should
also be corrected for these word inversion problems.

end 1st issue. These are IDL issues in addition to the ones identified in 5885.


Issue 5914: Section 4 of the Specification -- the IDL (lwlog-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 

            "Complete Logging Service IDL"

* Names the raised exception "InvalidParam" without ever
   declaring it.  Add to the IDL, probably near the beginning,
   the following declaration, or its equivalent:
       exception InvalidParam {
          string Details;
       };


* Syntax error in:
        enum LogFullAction (WRAP, HALT);
   Change to:
        enum LogFullAction {WRAP, HALT};

  [Error above is also in the specification text, section 3.2.4]

* These types appear needed by the IDL but nowhere actually
   defined in the IDL:
                        ProducerLogRecordSequence
                        LogProducerRecord

They are naming-confusion/consistency problems, and they
also appear in the text of the specification.
   They involve writers' confusion between the interface
name ("LogProducer") and the type names ProducerLog...
It is correctable by changing the current defective declaration
from:
        typedef sequence

Resolution: 

Revised Text: 

Actions taken:

April 23, 2003: received issue

Proposed Resolution - Accept proposed recommendation 

Proposed Revised Text - 
In the document Lightweight Log Service Specification - OMG Final Adopted Specification ptc/03/04/01
Section 4:  Complete Logging Service IDL

Add to the IDL, before the definition of interface LogStatus
   the following declaration:
    exception InvalidParam {
        string details;
    };

Change the IDL
FROM:
        enum LogFullAction (WRAP, HALT);
TO:
        enum LogFullAction {WRAP, HALT};

Change the IDL
FROM:
        typedef sequence<LogProducerRecord>
           LogProducerRecordSequence;
TO:
        typedef sequence<ProducerLogRecord>
           ProducerLogRecordSequence;

Issue 5915:  LogRecordSequence                                                                                  (lwlog-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.

Nature: Uncategorized Issue

Severity: 

Summary: 
* It is inconsistent to define LogRecordSequence outside of
   the interface of its user LogConsumer
   while attempting to define ProducerLogRecordSequence inside of
   the interface of its user LogProducer.


Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 23, 2003: received issue

Proposed Resolution -  Agree with recommendation

Proposed Revised Text
In the document Lightweight Log Service Specification - OMG Final Adopted Specification ptc/03/04/01
Section 4:  Complete Logging Service IDL
Move the typedef for ProducerLogRecordSequence immediately after the typedef for LogRecordSequence