Issue 5916: Text of the Specification: (PIM) (lwlog-ftf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: This is mostly sequential.  There is considerable, coding-oriented
meat here.  Forgive the initial attention to a few trivial
capitalization/editing problems noted.

Needs a consistent capitalization of RecordID/RecordId (recordId?),
starting with the table of contents and including every figure and
code example, as well as the text. (The IDL uses the former, but the specification text
   uses both.  (I understand that the CORBA is supposed to be
   case-insensitive, but that will not be true of the generated
   C++ or Java code.)

Page 2-5, section 2.2.2 ",do denote" should be ", to denote"

Page 2-7, section 2.2.9 "LogRecordType" should be "LogRecord type"

Page 2-15, near end of section 2.5 "unique record Id" should be
changed to "unique recordId"  (join the separated words, and use
whatever consistent capitalization is selected).

Page 2-16, section 2.6.2 "Void" type in the parameters box should
be "void" for consistency.

Page 2-17, section 2.6.3 "Void" type in the parameters box should
be "void" for consistency.

Page 2-18, section 2.6.5, code snipet  "Destroy () : void"
should be  "destroy () : void"  for consistency.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 23, 2003: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
3rd issue

Text of the Specification: (PIM)

This is mostly sequential.  There is considerable, coding-oriented
meat here.  Forgive the initial attention to a few trivial
capitalization/editing problems noted.

Needs a consistent capitalization of RecordID/RecordId (recordId?),
starting with the table of contents and including every figure and
code example, as well as the text. (The IDL uses the former, but the specification text
   uses both.  (I understand that the CORBA is supposed to be
   case-insensitive, but that will not be true of the generated
   C++ or Java code.)

Page 2-5, section 2.2.2 ",do denote" should be ", to denote"

Page 2-7, section 2.2.9 "LogRecordType" should be "LogRecord type"

Page 2-15, near end of section 2.5 "unique record Id" should be
changed to "unique recordId"  (join the separated words, and use
whatever consistent capitalization is selected).

Page 2-16, section 2.6.2 "Void" type in the parameters box should
be "void" for consistency.

Page 2-17, section 2.6.3 "Void" type in the parameters box should
be "void" for consistency.

Page 2-18, section 2.6.5, code snipet  "Destroy () : void"
should be  "destroy () : void"  for consistency.

end 3rd issue


Issue 5916: Text of the Specification: (PIM) (lwlog-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: 

This is mostly sequential.  There is considerable, coding-oriented
meat here.  Forgive the initial attention to a few trivial
capitalization/editing problems noted.

Needs a consistent capitalization of RecordID/RecordId (recordId?),
starting with the table of contents and including every figure and
code example, as well as the text. (The IDL uses the former, but the specification text
   uses both.  (I understand that the CORBA is supposed to be
   case-insensitive, but that will not be true of the generated
   C++ or Java code.)

Page 2-5, section 2.2.2 ",do denote" should be ", to denote"

Page 2-7, section 2.2.9 "LogRecordType" should be "LogRecord type"

Page 2-15, near end of section 2.5 "unique record Id" should be
changed to "unique recordId"  (join the separated words, and use
whatever consistent capitalization is selected).

Page 2-16, section 2.6.2 "Void" type in the parameters box should
be "void" for consistency.

Page 2-17, section 2.6.3 "Void" type in the parameters box should
be "void" for consistency.

Page 2-18, section 2.6.5, code snipet  "Destroy () : void"
should be  "destroy () : void"  for consistency.


Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 23, 2003: received issue

Proposed Resolution - These are shortcomings with the specification although they are largely editorial. The void changes are addressed as part of issue 5889.

Proposed Revised Text -  
In the document Lightweight Log Service Specification - OMG Final Adopted Specification ptc/03/04/01

Do a global search and replace changing all occurrences of RecordID to RecordId

Page 2-5, section 2.2.2 Change
FROM:
", do denote" 
TO:
", to denote"

Page 2-7, section 2.2.9 Change
FROM:
"LogRecordType"
TO:
"LogRecord type"

Page 2-15, near end of section 2.5 change
FROM:
"unique record Id"
TO:
"unique record ID" 

Page 2-18, section 2.6.5, Change
FROM:
"Destroy"
TO:
"destroy"