Issue 5922: Feature;ModelElement (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Critical Summary: Why there are two different Backbone Diagrams in the UML 1.5 Specification. The one on Page 71 shows that a Feature has a visibility and a ModelElement has just a name, nothing more. On Page 596 an Feature has the visibility not anymore, but ModelElement has one, how this should be interpreted, which one is the right visibility Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: April 29, 2003: received issue March 9, 2005: closed issue Discussion: This was a confusion on the part of the individual who raised the issue: the two representations represent different views of the same element with different attributes shown in each of the two views. (The visibility on ModelElement is actually a reference to the visibility that is attached in an ElementImport). Disposition: Closed, no change End of Annotations:===== From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 29 Apr 2003 15:34:55 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Lassnig Gernot Company: HTL Villach mailFrom: l_gernot@gmx.at Notification: Yes Specification: Feature;ModelElement Section: 2.5.2;5.1 FormalNumber: 03/03/03 Version: 1.5 RevisionDate: March 2003 Page: 71;596 Nature: Clarification Severity: Critical HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90) Description Why there are two different Backbone Diagrams in the UML 1.5 Specification. The one on Page 71 shows that a Feature has a visibility and a ModelElement has just a name, nothing more. On Page 596 an Feature has the visibility not anymore, but ModelElement has one, how this should be interpreted, which one is the right visibility?