Issue 6018: figure 8-137 and 8-139 (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: In figure 8-137, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment which inherits from NamedElement. In figure 8-139, EventOccurrence inherits directly from NamedElement. The two figures should be consistent with each other (yes, I know that inheritance is transitive, but it does raise unnecessary questions) Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: July 24, 2003: received issue March 9, 2005: closed issue Discussion: These figures correspond to figures 326 and 327 in the final adopted spec. However, in these later figures, there is no inconsistency, in both diagrams, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment and never from NamedElement. It may be that the Mr. Hickman either referred to an older internal version of the spec or that he simply misread the figures. Disposition: Closed, no change End of Annotations:===== From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 25 Jul 2003 11:53:48 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Steve Hickman Company: self mailFrom: shickman@ieee.org Notification: Yes Specification: UML 2.0 Superstructure Section: Chapter 6 FormalNumber: ad/03-04-01 Version: Third Revision RevisionDate: 4/1/03 Page: 367,368 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; T312461; Guidant IE5 09302001 Win2000 Distribution; .NET CLR 1.0.3705) Description In figure 8-137, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment which inherits from NamedElement. In figure 8-139, EventOccurrence inherits directly from NamedElement. OMG Issue No: 6018 Title: figure 8-137 and 8-139 Source: Steve Hickman (shickman@ieee.org) Summary: In figure 8-137, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment which inherits from NamedElement. In figure 8-139, EventOccurrence inherits directly from NamedElement. The two figures should be consistent with each other (yes, I know that inheritance is transitive, but it does raise unnecessary questions) Discussion: These figures correspond to figures 326 and 327 in the final adopted spec. However, in these later figures, there is no inconsistency, in both diagrams, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment and never from NamedElement. It may be that the Mr. Hickman either referred to an older internal version of the spec or that he simply misread the figures. Disposition: Closed, no change OMG Issue No: 6018 Title: figure 8-137 and 8-139 Source: Steve Hickman (shickman@ieee.org) Summary: In figure 8-137, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment which inherits from NamedElement. In figure 8-139, EventOccurrence inherits directly from NamedElement. The two figures should be consistent with each other (yes, I know that inheritance is transitive, but it does raise unnecessary questions) Discussion: These figures correspond to figures 326 and 327 in the final adopted spec. However, in these later figures, there is no inconsistency, in both diagrams, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment and never from NamedElement. It may be that the Mr. Hickman either referred to an older internal version of the spec or that he simply misread the figures. Disposition: Closed, no change OMG Issue No: 6018 Title: figure 8-137 and 8-139 Source: Steve Hickman (shickman@ieee.org) Summary: In figure 8-137, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment which inherits from NamedElement. In figure 8-139, EventOccurrence inherits directly from NamedElement. The two figures should be consistent with each other (yes, I know that inheritance is transitive, but it does raise unnecessary questions) Discussion: These figures correspond to figures 326 and 327 in the final adopted spec. However, in these later figures, there is no inconsistency, in both diagrams, EventOccurrence inherits from InteractionFragment and never from NamedElement. It may be that the Mr. Hickman either referred to an older internal version of the spec or that he simply misread the figures. Disposition: Closed, no change The two figures should be consistent with each other (yes, I know that inheritance is transitive, but it does raise unnecessary questions)