Issue 6051: Index base clarification (deployment-ftf) Source: Zuehlke Engineering (Mr. Frank Pilhofer, fpilhofer2008(at)gmail.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The second paragraph of 9.4.1 (Generic Transformation Rules for the PIM for CCM to PSM for CCM for IDL Transformation) reads, in part, To avoid redundancy and circular graphs, non-composite associations between classes with a common owner are expressed by an ordinal attribute [...] The value of this attribute is the index of the target element in its container. It should be clarified that the index is zero-based. Proposed resolution: In section 9.4.1, second paragraph, amend the second sentence to read, The value of this attribute is the index of the target element in its container, with the index of the first element being 0 (zero). Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: August 12, 2003: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Subject: Index base clarification Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:14:53 -0400 Thread-Topic: Index base clarification Thread-Index: AcNhDmRRzDTLZ/UCSYeEyMkCLMcBRg== From: "Pilhofer, Frank" To: Cc: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by amethyst.omg.org id h7CKFXkG020991 Haven't posted new issues in a while, so I figured it's about time for some more. The second paragraph of 9.4.1 (Generic Transformation Rules for the PIM for CCM to PSM for CCM for IDL Transformation) reads, in part, To avoid redundancy and circular graphs, non-composite associations between classes with a common owner are expressed by an ordinal attribute [...] The value of this attribute is the index of the target element in its container. It should be clarified that the index is zero-based. Proposed resolution: In section 9.4.1, second paragraph, amend the second sentence to read, The value of this attribute is the index of the target element in its container, with the index of the first element being 0 (zero)