Issue 6086: More explanation needed on Figure 339 (uml2-rtf) Source: SINTEF (Dr. Oystein Haugen, oystein.haugen(at)sintef.no) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: The Figure 339 on page 425 needs more explanation. The use of lifelines to represent return value, and the notation for interaction occurrences with return value should be explained in greater length. Furthermore it should be made clear how the operations put and get are used to set and read values from lifelines representing attributes and parameters. Resolution: Disposition: Deferred to UML 2.4 RTF Revised Text: Actions taken: August 29, 2003: received issue Discussion: Due to lack of time, the RTF/FTF agrees that the following are problems that need fixing, but decided to defer their resolution to a future RTF working on this specification. End of Annotations:===== From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 28 Aug 2003 03:05:22 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Oystein Haugen Company: Ericsson mailFrom: oystein.haugen@ericsson.com Notification: Yes Specification: UML 2.0 Superstructure Section: 14.3.10 FormalNumber: ptc/03-08-02 Version: 2.0 RevisionDate: August 2003 Page: 425 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) Description More explanation needed on Figure 339 The Figure 339 on page 425 needs more explanation. The use of lifelines to represent return value, and the notation for interaction occurrences with return value should be explained in greater length. Furthermore it should be made clear how the operations put and get are used to set and read values from lifelines representing attributes and parameters. Originally reported by Lars Tufvesson, Telelogic