Issue 612: use_servant_manager and default_servant (port-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Severity: Summary: Summary: What if both use_servant_manager and default_servant set? Resolution: clarified, close issue Revised Text: Actions taken: June 20, 1997: received issue June 25, 1998: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== Return-Path: Date: 20 Jun 97 11:05:42 -0700 From: "JSPIRN.US.ORACLE.COM" To: issues@omg.org Subject: Issues for Portability RTF Cc: HSPINTZI@us.oracle.com, MHILL@us.oracle.com, JTREZZO@us.oracle.com, DBROWER@us.oracle.com These issues were actually prepared by Dave Brower of Oracle. I am forwarding them in my capacity as a member of the Portability RTF. ================================ POA RTF Items Revision 0.1 4-Jun-97 Contributors David Brower For comments and updates contact dbrower@us.oracle.com jspirn@us.oracle.com Notice--draft document only This is a draft for discussion purposes only. There's no commitment to do anything suggested here. Introduction This note identifies a number of items we'd like to see resolved in the POA RTF. It is not yet complete, and should not be taken as our only input. 1.0 Questions 1.1 What if both use_servant_manager and default_servant set? Return-Path: Sender: jon@sems.com Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 11:03:29 -0700 From: Jonathan Biggar Organization: Seagate Software, Network & Storage Management Group To: "JSPIRN.US.ORACLE.COM" Cc: port-rtf@omg.org, JTREZZO@us.oracle.com, DBROWER@us.oracle.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Issues for Portability RTF References: <199708060103.SAA09778@mailsun2.us.oracle.com> Here are my thoughts on these issues: JSPIRN.US.ORACLE.COM wrote: > 1.0 Questions > > 1.1 What if both use_servant_manager and default_servant set? This can't happen. If the POA has the USE_SERVANT_MANAGER policy, then the operationset_servant() will throw WrongPolicy if used.