Issue 6125: Colon notation for pins (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov) Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant Summary: Clarify that parameter notation can be used for pins even when they aren't invocation actions. Resolution: see above Revised Text: Actions taken: August 30, 2003: received issue March 8, 2005: closed issue Discussion: Under Pin class, Notation section, first paragraph, before the last sentence, add another sentence: "Pins that do not correspond to parameters can be labelled as "name : type"." Under ObjectNode class, Notation section, second sentence, add to the end of the sentence: ", or the name and type of the node in the format "name : type"." Under Parameter Node class, Notation section, add as first sentence: "The label for parameter nodes can be a full specification of the corresponding parameter." End of Annotations:===== Name: Conrad Bock Company: NIST mailFrom: conrad.bock@nist.gov Nature: Clarfication Severity: Significant Subject: Colon notation for pins Clarify that parameter notation can be used for pins even when they aren't invocation actions. =================================================================== OMG Issue No: 6125 Title: Colon notation for pins Source: Kabira Technologies, Inc. (Mr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock@nist.gov) Summary: Clarify that parameter notation can be used for pins even when they aren't invocation actions. Discussion: Under Pin class, Notation section, first paragraph, before the last sentence, add another sentence: "Pins that do not correspond to parameters can be labelled as "name : type"." Under ObjectNode class, Notation section, second sentence, add to the end of the sentence: ", or the name and type of the node in the format "name : type"." Under Parameter Node class, Notation section, add as first sentence: "The label for parameter nodes can be a full specification of the corresponding parameter." Disposition: Resolved