Issue 6136: Pins on structured nodes 2 (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov) Nature: Revision Severity: Significant Summary: Is it really intended that all StructuredActivityNode's have pins, such as ExpansionRegions? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: August 30, 2003: received issue March 9, 2005: closed issue Discussion: Yes, see discussion at 6134. Disposition: Closed no change End of Annotations:===== Name: Conrad Bock Company: NIST mailFrom: conrad.bock@nist.gov Nature: Revision Severity: Significant Subject: Pins on structured nodes 2 Is it really intended that all StructuredActivityNode's have pins, such OMG Issue No: 6136 Title: Pins on structured nodes 2 Source: Kabira Technologies, Inc. (Mr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock@nist.gov) Summary: Is it really intended that all StructuredActivityNode's have pins, such as ExpansionRegions? Discussion: Yes, see discussion at 6134. Disposition: Closed no change as ExpansionRegions?