Issue 6176: UML 2 Super/Metamodel::Constructs/owningComment (uml2-rtf) Source: Simula Research Laboratory (Mr. Bran Selic, selic(at)acm.org) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Constructs association owningCommet:Element[0..1] c--> ownedCommet:Comment[0..*] should have been owningElement:Element[0..1] c--> ownedCommet:Comment[0..*] as defined in Kernel/Root. Resolution: see below Revised Text: The issue identifies as real problem in the Rose model InfrastructureLibrary.cat file. The offending "owningComment" association end name appears only in this file (most recent version: ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/UML_2.0_superstructure-ftf/_UML2 Super.MDL.040711.zip) and does not appear in either the UML 2.0 Superstructure FAS (ptc/03-08-02) or the UML 2.0 Infrastructure FAS (ptc/03-09-15). Proposed Resolution: In the InfrastructureLibrary.cat file, change the name of the association end InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningComment to InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningElement. Revised Text: Editor’s note: This was fixed in the metamodel – however, it also required a change to the diagram in figure 9.10 In the InfrastructureLibrary.cat file, change the name of the association end InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningComment to InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningElement. Actions taken: September 7, 2003: received issue August 23, 2006: closed issue Discussion: The issue identifies as real problem in the Rose model InfrastructureLibrary.cat file. The offending "owningComment" association end name appears only in this file (most recent version: ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/UML_2.0_superstructure-ftf/_UML2-Super.MDL.040711.zip) and does not appear in either the UML 2.0 Superstructure FAS (ptc/03-08-02) or the UML 2.0 Infrastructure FAS (ptc/03-09-15). Resolution: In the InfrastructureLibrary.cat file, change the name of the association end InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningComment to InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningElement. End of Annotations:===== To: issues@omg.org Subject: UML 2 Super/Metamodel::Constructs/owningComment X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 From: Branislav Selic Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:36:37 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML05/25/M/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 09/07/2003 08:36:39, Serialize complete at 09/07/2003 08:36:39 Constructs association owningCommet:Element[0..1] c--> ownedCommet:Comment[0..*] should have been owningElement:Element[0..1] c--> ownedCommet:Comment[0..*] as defined in Kernel/Root. Bran Selic IBM Software Group -- Rational Software 770 Palladium Drive Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2V 1C8 ph. (613) 591-7915 fax (613) 599-3912 Subject: ,cl, Proposed resolution for issue 6176 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:51:07 -0700 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ,cl, Proposed resolution for issue 6176 Thread-Index: AcRp9Qv+Ri4hxJdARu+tclG9uGBYUA== From: "Tolbert, Doug M" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2004 22:51:07.0971 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D076930:01C469F5] X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by amethyst.omg.org id i6EN0Alj031037 OMG Issue No: 6176 Title: UML 2 Super/Metamodel::Constructs/owningComment Source: Bran Selic, IBM (bselic@ca.ibm.com) Summary: Constructs association owningCommet:Element[0..1] c--> ownedCommet:Comment[0..*] should have been owningElement:Element[0..1] c--> ownedCommet:Comment[0..*] as defined in Kernel/Root. Discussion: The issue identifies as real problem in the Rose model InfrastructureLibrary.cat file. The offending "owningComment" association end name appears only in this file (most recent version: ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/UML_2.0_superstructure-ftf/_UML2-Super.MDL.040711.zip) and does not appear in either the UML 2.0 Superstructure FAS (ptc/03-08-02) or the UML 2.0 Infrastructure FAS (ptc/03-09-15). Resolution: In the InfrastructureLibrary.cat file, change the name of the association end InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningComment to InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningElement. Disposition: Resolved ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To: "Tolbert, Doug M" Cc: mu2i-ftf@Omg.org, uml2-superstructure-ftf@Omg.org Subject: Re: ,cl, Proposed resolution for issue 6176 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 From: Branislav Selic Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:17:32 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML01/25/M/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF2|July 23, 2003) at 07/15/2004 16:17:34, Serialize complete at 07/15/2004 16:17:34 I'm happy with this and can include it in ballot 19 because it is so simple and localized. Any views to the contrary? Bran "Tolbert, Doug M" 07/14/2004 06:51 PM To , cc Subject ,cl, Proposed resolution for issue 6176 OMG Issue No: 6176 Title: UML 2 Super/Metamodel::Constructs/owningComment Source: Bran Selic, IBM (bselic@ca.ibm.com) Summary: Constructs association owningCommet:Element[0..1] c--> ownedCommet:Comment[0..*] should have been owningElement:Element[0..1] c--> ownedCommet:Comment[0..*] as defined in Kernel/Root. Discussion: The issue identifies as real problem in the Rose model InfrastructureLibrary.cat file. The offending "owningComment" association end name appears only in this file (most recent version: ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/UML_2.0_superstructure-ftf/_UML2-Super.MDL.040711.zip) and does not appear in either the UML 2.0 Superstructure FAS (ptc/03-08-02) or the UML 2.0 Infrastructure FAS (ptc/03-09-15). Resolution: In the InfrastructureLibrary.cat file, change the name of the association end InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningComment to InfrastructureLibrary::Core::Abstractions::Comments::owningElement. Disposition: Resolved ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. e-mail: bselic@ca.ibm.com