Issue 6178: BehaviorStateMachines/missing owningState end name (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: Simula Research Laboratory (Mr. Bran Selic, selic(at)acm.org) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Package BehaviorStateMachines has association :State[0..1] c-> stateInvariant: Kernel::Constraint[0..1] is missing the owningState end name as defined in ProtocolStateMachines owningState:State[0..1] c-> stateInvariant: Kernel::Constraint[0..1] Resolution: see above Revised Text: Actions taken: September 7, 2003: received issue March 8, 2005: closed issue Discussion: This is an error in the metamodel, it does not appear in the actual spec. The fix requires that the role name Constraint::owningState : State be removed in the XMI (i.e., in the metamodel). End of Annotations:===== To: issues@omg.org Subject: UML 2 Super/Metamodel::BehaviorStateMachines/missing owningState end name X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 From: Branislav Selic Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:40:17 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML05/25/M/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 09/07/2003 08:40:19, Serialize complete at 09/07/2003 08:40:20, Serialize by Router on D25ML05/25/M/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 09/07/2003 08:40:20 Package BehaviorStateMachines has association :State[0..1] c-> stateInvariant: Kernel::Constraint[0..1] is missing the owningState end name as defined in ProtocolStateMachines owningState:State[0..1] c-> stateInvariant: Kernel::Constraint[0..1] Bran Selic IBM Software Group -- Rational Software 770 Palladium Drive Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2V 1C8 ph. (613) 591-7915 fax (613) 599-3912 e-mail: bselic@ca.ibm.com OMG Issue No: 6178 Title: BehaviorStateMachines/missing owningState end name Source: International Business Machines (Mr. Bran Selic, bselic@ca.ibm.com) Summary: Package BehaviorStateMachines has association :State[0..1] c-> stateInvariant: Kernel::Constraint[0..1] is missing the owningState end name as defined in ProtocolStateMachines owningState:State[0..1] c-> stateInvariant: Kernel::Constraint[0..1] Discussion: This is an error in the metamodel, it does not appear in the actual spec. The fix requires that the role name Constraint::owningState : State be removed in the XMI (i.e., in the metamodel). Disposition: Resolved