Issue 6263: UML 2 Super / Interactions / No way to model reply messages (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: Simula Research Laboratory (Mr. Bran Selic, selic(at)acm.org) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: It seems that there is no direct way to specify a "reply" message in the UML metamodel for Interactions -- even though there is a notation for this concept (dashed arrow). Resolution: see above Revised Text: Actions taken: September 26, 2003: received issue December 2, 2004: closed issue Discussion: The notation and modeling of return (reply) messages is the subject of issue 6077 and will be solved in the context of that issue’s resolution. Disposition: Duplicate End of Annotations:===== ubject: UML 2 Super / Interactions / No way to model reply messages X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 From: Branislav Selic Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:32:25 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML05/25/M/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 09/26/2003 09:32:32, Serialize complete at 09/26/2003 09:32:32 It seems that there is no direct way to specify a "reply" message in the UML metamodel for Interactions -- even though there is a notation for this concept (dashed arrow). Bran Selic IBM Software Group -- Rational Software 770 Palladium Drive Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2V 1C8 ph. (613) 591-7915 fax (613) 599-3912 OMG Issue No: 6263 Title: UML 2 Super / Interactions / No way to model reply messages Source: International Business Machines (Mr. Bran Selic, bselic@ca.ibm.com) Summary: It seems that there is no direct way to specify a "reply" message in the UML metamodel for Interactions -- even though there is a notation for this concept (dashed arrow). Discussion: The notation and modeling of return (reply) messages is the subject of issue 6077 and will be solved in the context of that issue.s resolution. Disposition: Duplicate e-mail: bselic@ca.ibm.com