Issue 6439: UML 2.0 significant typo - collaboration diagram (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: Object Management Group (Dr. Jon M. Siegel, siegel(at)omg.org) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Significant Summary: In the UML 2.0 Superstructure final adopted specification document 03-08-02 (and all previous versions), the phrase "collaboration diagram" appears in the last row of Figure 464 on page 590, and in no other place in the entire document. This occurrence probably missed the global change from "collaboration diagram" to "communication diagram". This is a key figure that is likely to be reproduced in many articles and slide sets, and should be fixed. Resolution: This is the same as issue 6066. Revised Text: Actions taken: November 6, 2003: received issue December 2, 2004: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== ender: siegel@192.67.184.64 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 13:21:55 -0500 To: issues@omg.org From: Jon Siegel Subject: UML 2.0 significant typo Hi -- In the UML 2.0 Superstructure final adopted specification document 03-08-02 (and all previous versions), the phrase "collaboration diagram" appears in the last row of Figure 464 on page 590, and in no other place in the entire document. This occurrence probably missed the global change from "collaboration diagram" to "communication diagram". This is a key figure that is likely to be reproduced in many articles and slide sets, and should be fixed. Thanks -- Jon Siegel ================================================================== Dr. Jon Siegel email: siegel@omg.org Vice President, Technology Transfer http://www.omg.org Object Management Group First Needham Place Phone: 781-444-0404 250 First Avenue, Suite 100 Fax: 781-444-0320 Needham, MA 02494 USA OMG Issue No: 6439 Title: UML 2.0 significant typo - collaboration diagram Source: Object Management Group (Dr. Jon M. Siegel, siegel@omg.org) Summary: In the UML 2.0 Superstructure final adopted specification document 03-08-02 (and all previous versions), the phrase "collaboration diagram" appears in the last row of Figure 464 on page 590, and in no other place in the entire document. This occurrence probably missed the global change from "collaboration diagram" to "communication diagram". This is a key figure that is likely to be reproduced in many articles and slide sets, and should be fixed. Discussion: This is the same as issue 6066. Disposition: Duplicate ==================================================================