Issue 6508: Diagrams, Diagrams, Diagrams ... UML 2 Superstructure issue (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: Daimler AG (Mr. Mario Jeckle, mario(at)jeckle.de) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: While trying understand the jungle of diagrams offered by UML I probably discovered an inconsistency within the most recent Superstructure document. Page A-546 shows a class digram giving a taxonomy of structure and behavior diagrams. The figure (numbered A-5) is accompanied with some descriptive text at the same page. The diagrams includes a box (class) for a diagram called the "collaboration diagram" which is not mentioned in the document set elsewhere. But the text mentiones a "communication diagram" which is completely missing in the figure. Additionally, shouldn't the "protocol state machine" be shown as a specialization of the "state machine diagram"? Resolution: duplicate Revised Text: Actions taken: November 7, 2003: received issue December 2, 2004: closed issue Discussion: This is the same issue as 6066. Note also that there is no special protocol-state machine diagram – it is just a state machine diagram. End of Annotations:===== -Return: cris.kobryn@telelogic.com Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 07:16:49 -0000 From: "Cris Kobryn" To: juergen@omg.org, issues@omg.org, cris.kobryn@telelogic.com Subject: Fwd: Diagrams, Diagrams, Diagrams ... UML 2 Superstructure issue User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 68.71.8.84 --- In u2p-issues@yahoogroups.com, Mario Jeckle wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 While trying understand the jungle of diagrams offered by UML I probably discovered an inconsistency within the most recent Superstructure document. Page A-546 shows a class digram giving a taxonomy of structure and behavior diagrams. The figure (numbered A-5) is accompanied with some descriptive text at the same page. The diagrams includes a box (class) for a diagram called the "collaboration diagram" which is not mentioned in the document set elsewhere. But the text mentiones a "communication diagram" which is completely missing in the figure. Additionally, shouldn't the "protocol state machine" be shown as a specialization of the "state machine diagram"? Mario - -- Prof. Mario Jeckle University of Applied Sciences Furtwangen Dept. Business Applications of Computer Science W3C Representative of DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology OMG Representative of DaimlerChrysler URL: http://www.jeckle.de MailTo:mario@j... MailTo:jeckle@f... My public key: http://www.jeckle.de/marioJeckle.pub [mail really from me _always_ has this signature and is signed digitally - -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/DrNv46tt20EwGqwRAoaJAJ4xH6irC7HxHwyNGHJBMz1Y0KUoIwCbBaqw Io+xe3x04RSOkzu/LPRvg90= =mly5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- OMG Issue No: 6508 Title: Diagrams, Diagrams, Diagrams ... UML 2 Superstructure issue Source: DaimlerChrysler (Mr. Mario Jeckle, mario@jeckle.de) Summary: While trying understand the jungle of diagrams offered by UML I Probably discovered an inconsistency within the most recent Superstructure document. Page A-546 shows a class digram giving a taxonomy of structure and behavior diagrams. The figure (numbered A-5) is accompanied with some descriptive text at the same page. The diagrams includes a box (class) for a diagram called the "collaboration diagram" which is not mentioned in the document set elsewhere. But the text mentions a "communication diagram" which is completely missing in the figure. Additionally, shouldn't the "protocol state machine" be shown as a specialization of the "state machine diagram"? Discussion: This is the same issue as 6066. Note also that there is no special protocol-state machine diagram . it is just a state machine diagram. Disposition: Duplicate --- End forwarded message ---