Issue 6884: The notation when nesting "if then else" is too verbose (ocl2-rtf)
Source: France Telecom R&D (Mr. Mariano Belaunde, mariano.belaunde(at)orange.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Suggestion: Define a "switch" collection function, with a sepecific notation, as in: 
         mylist->switch( iterator | cond1 ? exp1, cond2 ? exp2, …, else ? expN) 
     The expressions cond2 is not evaluated if cond1 returns true and so on. 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
January 7, 2004: received issue
Discussion: 
This is a request to improve the language. Better solved in a RTF.
End of Annotations:=====
SSUE: The notation when nesting "if then else" is too verbose. 
     Suggestion: Define a "switch" collection function, with a sepecific notation, as in: 
         mylist->switch( iterator | cond1 ? exp1, cond2 ? exp2, …, else ? expN) 
     The expressions cond2 is not evaluated if cond1 returns true and so on.