Issue 6895: Make usage of tuples less complex and less verbose (ocl2-rtf)
Source: France Telecom R&D (Mr. Mariano Belaunde, mariano.belaunde(at)orange.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Suggestions: 
     - Make type spec of internal fields optional. 
     - Make field name in tuples optional (using positional access) 



Resolution: OCL 2.3 relaxed VariableDeclarationCS to allow inference of an omitted type from an initializer.
Allowing field names to be omitted and resolved positionally reduces type safety of programs when first written and makes them vulnerable to meta-model evolution thereafter.
Disposition: Closed, no change
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
January 7, 2004: received issue
December 23, 2013: closed issue
Discussion: 
This is a request to improve the language. Better solved in a RTF.
End of Annotations:=====
SSUE: Make usage of tuples less complex and less verbose. 
  Suggestions: 
     - Make type spec of internal fields optional. 
     - Make field name in tuples optional (using positional access