Issue 7152: Deployment - keyword <<deploy>> not introduced DeploymentTarget - Missing OCL expression () Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: In UML 1.4, the visual representation of a deployment relationship is adorned with the keyword <<deploy>>. I suggest to introduce this is keyword in section "Notation" on page 188. Also, adorn the deployment relationship in Figure 130 on page 188 with <<deploy>>. Table 9 on page 199 includes the notation for a deployment dependency including the keyword <<deploy>>, but the depencendy arrow should be drawn with a dashed line. Resolution: see above Revised Text: Actions taken: March 13, 2004: received issue March 8, 2005: closed issue Discussion: Insert on page 138 in section 10.3.4 Notation after figure 130 the following text and diagram: An alternative notation to containing the deployed artifacts within a deployment target symbol, is to use a dependency labeled <<deploy>> that is drawn from the artifact to the deployment target. :AppServer1 ShoppingCart.jar Order.jar «deploy» «deploy» «artifact» «artifact» Figure 131: An alternative deployment representation using a dependency labeled <<deploy>>. In table 9, section 10.5, change the deploy dependency to have a dashed line, instead of a solid one. Disposition: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 13 Mar 2004 07:53:15 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Karl Guggisberg Company: na mailFrom: karl.guggisberg@guggis.ch Notification: Yes Specification: Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure Section: 14.3.4 FormalNumber: ptc/03-08-02 Version: 2.0 RevisionDate: na Page: 188 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Description Deployment - keyword <> not introduced In UML 1.4, the visual representation of a deployment relationship is adorned with the keyword <>. I suggest to introduce this is keyword in section "Notation" on page 188. Also, adorn the deployment relationship in Figure 130 on page 188 with <>. Table 9 on page 199 includes the notation for a deployment dependency including the keyword <>, but the depencendy arrow should be drawn with a dashed line.