Issue 7205: treatment of currentId should be consistent (lwlog-rtf)
Source:  (Mr. Dominick Paniscotti, )
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: As discussed in item #1, the treatment of currentId should be consistent across the retrieveRecords and retrieveRecordsBy* functions. Further, the wording used in the descriptions with regard to the currentId and howMany parameters should be the same
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 25, 2004: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Subject: November 2003 Version 1.0, formal/03-11-03 Issue 
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:11:01 -0500 
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: November 2003 Version 1.0, formal/03-11-03 Issue 
Thread-Index: AcQSnKdzIFEZ2XQjRGK3V+E0HpNkqwAACucA 
From: "Paniscotti, Dominick (US SSA)" <dominick.paniscotti@baesystems.com> 
To: <issues@omg.org>, <lwlog-rtf@omg.org> 
Cc: "Fay, Thomas J. (US SSA)" <thomas.fay@baesystems.com> 
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2004 19:11:02.0514 (UTC) FILETIME=[EA1C5520:01C4129C] 


As discussed in item #1, the treatment of currentId should be consistent across the retrieveRecords and retrieveRecordsBy* functions. Further, the wording used in the descriptions with regard to the currentId and howMany parameters should be the same.