Issue 7619: Can we eliminate CosPropertyService.idl from Lightweight time (lwservices-ftf)
Source: Rockwell Collins (Mr. David Haverkamp, dahaverk(at)yahoo.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Can we eliminate the CosPropertyService.idl from the Lightweight time? or
at least make it optional or embedded system friendly?


I have some thoughts about it...  But, I'd like to hear what others think.
Obviously this would have to be something deferred to the RTF if we do it.


Obviously, I'm starting to think about some implementation issues with
Lightweight Services.


It seem to bring along alot of extra baggage...


Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 28, 2004: eceived issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: <dahaverk@rockwellcollins.com> 
Subject: Can we eliminate CosPropertyService.idl from Lightweight time. 
To: lwservices-ftf@omg.org 
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10  March 22, 2002 
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:13:05 -0500 
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CollinsCRSMTP02/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins(Release 
 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 07/28/2004 05:13:07 PM 


I have a question...


Can we eliminate the CosPropertyService.idl from the Lightweight time? or
at least make it optional or embedded system friendly?


I have some thoughts about it...  But, I'd like to hear what others think.
Obviously this would have to be something deferred to the RTF if we do it.


Obviously, I'm starting to think about some implementation issues with
Lightweight Services.


It seem to bring along alot of extra baggage...

-Dave