Issue 7629: The (IDL) definition of the example is not correct (uml-ccm-ftf)
Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS (Mr. Tom Ritter, tom.ritter(at)fokus.fraunhofer.de)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: The (IDL) definition of the example is not correct. The valuetyp for the key is not allowed to be abstract and it must have at least one public member. Furthermore, this key needs to be derived from Components::PrimaryKeyBase. The picture of the UML model should also be completely shown (i.e. including the member of the primary key). Suggestion: Modify example (IDL and picture) 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
August 13, 2004: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org 
Date: 13 Aug 2004 11:14:30 -0400 
To: <issues@omg.org> 
Subject: Issue/Bug Report 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Tom Ritter
Company: Fraunhofer FOKUS
mailFrom: ritter@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Notification: Yes
Specification: UML Profile for CCM
Section: 8.1.2
FormalNumber: ptc/03-12-01
Version: draft adopted specification
RevisionDate: december 2003
Page: 14
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-DE; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
Description
The (IDL) definition of the example is not correct. The valuetyp for the key is not allowed to be abstract and it must have at least one public member. Furthermore, this key needs to be derived from Components::PrimaryKeyBase. The picture of the UML model should also be completely shown (i.e. including the member of the primary key). Suggestion: Modify example (IDL and picture)