Issue 7677: Rule (26): (mof2idl-ftf) Source: Vanderbilt University (Mr. Jeff Parsons, j.parsons@vanderbilt.edu) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: I assume the <association_name>Link struct member names will be in correspoding format_2, but it should probably be stated explicitly. Resolution: Revised Text: Resolution: This assumption is correct and the specification must be changed accordingly. In conjunction with issue 7750 the specification of the members' types need also to be added. Revised Text: Change Rule(26) on page 21 into: Furthermore, an IDL struct for the link-set is derived for an association with name concatenate ( format_1 ( <association name> ), "Link" ). This struct contains two members of type of the association's ends' derived abstract (common) interfaces with the same name as the association end (in format_2). The type of the members is set to the abstract interfaces derived according to Rule(8). Furthermore, a typedef sequence of type <association-name>Link with name <association-name>LinkSet for the link-set is also generated. Actions taken: September 6, 2004: received issue August 1, 2005: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== ubject: MOF2IDL mapping Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:16:18 -0500 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: MOF2IDL mapping Thread-Index: AcSUJHTFwahHMfvER7WSgIq7oenOyw== From: "Jeff Parsons" To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by amethyst.omg.org id i86FVM1U010156 Rule (26): I assume the Link struct member names will be in correspoding format_2, but it should probably be stated explicitly. thanks, Jeff Parsons