Issue 7779: UML 2.0 Issue: Semantics of Provided and Required Interfaces (uml2-superstructure-ftf) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: In your presentation in Bertinoro you had a figure representing the mapping of the classic 'lollipop-notation' for provided and required interfaces into stereotyped dependencies between the port and the interfaces. I would like to propose that a similar picture be included in the specification to make the intent of the specification clearer. A good place for this figure would probably be 9.3.11, Notation, just after Figure 110 (based on ptc/03-08-02). Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 21, 2004: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== ubject: Fw: UML 2.0 Issue: Semantics of Provided and Required Interfaces X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.1CF1 March 04, 2003 From: Branislav Selic Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:28:41 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML01/25/M/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF2|July 23, 2003) at 09/20/2004 19:28:42, Serialize complete at 09/20/2004 19:28:42 Juergen, Please post this issue to UML 2 Super Regards, Bran Selic IBM Distinguished Engineer IBM Rational Software 770 Palladium Drive Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2V 1C8 ph.: (613) 591-7915 fax: (613) 599-3912 e-mail: bselic@ca.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Branislav Selic/Ottawa/IBM on 09/20/2004 07:28 PM ----- Steffen Zschaler 09/20/2004 10:25 AM To Branislav Selic/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA cc Subject UML 2.0 Issue: Semantics of Provided and Required Interfaces Dear Mr Selic, Following up on our discussion in Bertinoro last week, I would like to post the following issue against the current version of the UML 2.0 superstructure specification. In your presentation in Bertinoro you had a figure representing the mapping of the classic 'lollipop-notation' for provided and required interfaces into stereotyped dependencies between the port and the interfaces. I would like to propose that a similar picture be included in the specification to make the intent of the specification clearer. A good place for this figure would probably be 9.3.11, Notation, just after Figure 110 (based on ptc/03-08-02). Best regards, Steffen Zschaler -- Dipl.-Inf. Steffen Zschaler Research Assistant Dresden University of Technology Department of Computer Science Phone +49 351 463 38555 Fax +49 351 463 38459 Email Steffen.Zschaler@inf.tu-dresden.de WWW http://www.inf.tu-dresden.de/~sz9