Issue 7797: We should use the phrase "QoS Provided" instead of "QoS offered".                                                                                                                                       (uml-qos-ft-ftf)
Source: BAE SYSTEMS (Mr. Kevin Dockerill, kevin.dockerill@baesystems.com)
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Minor
Summary: We should use the phrase "QoS Provided" instead of "QoS offered".

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 30, 2004: received issue
March 8, 2006: closed issue
Discussion: 
QoS offered is a well established term in other QoS standards. ISO15935 was a basic reference in the RFP and we have used this and other ISO standards as basic source of terminology.
Disposition:	Closed, no change

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org 
Date: 30 Sep 2004 06:13:54 -0400 
To: <issues@omg.org> 
Subject: Issue/Bug Report 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Kevin Dockerill
Company: BAE SYSTEMS, Warton, Lancs UK
mailFrom: Kevin.dockerill@baesystems.com
Notification: No
Specification: UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms
Section: Section 8.3
FormalNumber: Ptc/2004-06-01
Version: Draft
RevisionDate: 7/21/2004
Page: 14
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Description
We should use the phrase "QoS Provided" instead of "QoS offered".