Issue 7800: The term "QoS Level" doesn't seem right (uml-qos-ft-ftf)
Source: BAE SYSTEMS (Mr. Kevin Dockerill, kevin.dockerill(at)baesystems.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: The term "QoS Level" doesn't seem right. Maybe "QoS Configuration" is better.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 30, 2004: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org 
Date: 30 Sep 2004 06:16:27 -0400 
To: <issues@omg.org> 
Subject: Issue/Bug Report 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Kevin Dockerill
Company: BAE SYSTEMS, Warton, Lancs UK
mailFrom: Kevin.dockerill@baesystems.com
Notification: No
Specification: UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms
Section: Section 8.4
FormalNumber: Ptc/2004-06-01
Version: Draft
RevisionDate: 7/21/2004
Page: 16
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Description
The term "QoS Level" doesn't seem right. Maybe "QoS Configuration" is better.